this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

Medicine Canada

315 readers
1 users here now

A community for Canadian physicians and medical professionals


🍁 While this community is intended for Canadian discussions, you are free to post about other medical systems. We're all in this together :)



Related Communities

For better links and descriptions, see the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

  1. No requests for professional advice or general medical information. Please do not solicit medical advice or share personal health anecdotes about yourself or others.

  2. No promotions, advertisements, surveys, or petitions.

  3. Link to high-quality, original research whenever possible: Posts which rely on or reference scientific data (e.g. an announcement about a medical breakthrough) should link to the original research in peer-reviewed medical journals or respectable news sources as judged by the moderators. Sensationalized titles, misrepresentation of results, or promotion of blatantly bad science may lead to removal.

  4. Act professionally and decently: /r/medicine is a public forum that represents the medical community and comments should reflect this. Please keep disagreement civil and focused on issues.

  5. Protect patient confidentiality. Please anonymize cases and remove any patient-identifiable information.

  6. No memes or low-effort posts: Memes, image links (including social media screenshots), images of text, or other low-effort posts or comments are not allowed.

These rules have been modelled after /r/medicine. While some rules were modified or skipped as this is a much smaller community, we can revisit the rules as we go. Thank you :)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: After posting, I checked out two of the original studies cited in the article, and I think the author of the Canadian Affairs article was off-base with the things I've since struck out. I don't believe data exists to say that physical vs psychological factors are greater contributors to ED - they both seem relevant.

~~A recent study of thousands of American men under 40 found nearly 15 per cent struggled with erectile dysfunction. Most cases were strongly linked to psychological, rather than physical, causes.~~

~~Other studies have suggested psychological or emotional factors may explain as many as 85 per cent of ED cases.~~

A 2018 review of 49 international studies found that men with depression were 39 per cent more likely to experience erectile dysfunction than men without depression.

And yet, mental health is rarely assessed in ED clinical trials or included in treatment plans. A 2025 Canadian evaluation of more than 450 ED clinical trials found that fewer than eight per cent mentioned mental health issues.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm sure the brains and lungs and balls and blood full of microplastics is entirely unrelated.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Microplastics are stored in the balls?

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

(In the balls in the balls)

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

What connection do you believe could exist between ED and microplastics, and why do you think that

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

No idea.

I think our once unfathomable pollution is having unforseen effects in unforseen ways.

Everyone thought sanity would prevail. That the world would slam on the brakes before any of this got this bad. Instead our leaders accelerated. Daring the rapidly approaching cliff to allow us to fling ourselves into oblivion.

Mostly unrelated. But how long do you think it'll take our inevitable replacement as apex predator to rise to our current level? Dolphins or corvids or whatever they turn out to be. Will they repeat our mistakes? Could we build anything that would last long enough to warn them?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Mostly unrelated. But how long do you think it’ll take our inevitable replacement as apex predator to rise to our current level? Dolphins or corvids or whatever they turn out to be. Will they repeat our mistakes? Could we build anything that would last long enough to warn them?

depends on how bad the climate and pollution get.

perhaps the successor will be eusocial and recognize the impacts and folly. but I don't know how a successor would manage to have an industrial revolution with all the easy oil and coal stripped out. given geological time periods it'll be fine, but I wonder how many would be species will suffer for ages in the interim.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Great apes are herbivores. Humans are built to hunt tubers. That's why our mouths are full of amalayse and not teeth that can rend hide.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cool. But our replacements.

Do you think some other apes will survive and eventually replace us?

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

No, we will exterminate them all before we go kicking and sobbing.