interestingasfuck

8312 readers

2 users here now

For exceptionally interesting content

Rules:

Posts must be interesting
Posts must be based in reality
No hateful content
No harmful content
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

svc@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz

1236

why aren't we funding this.... (feddit.org)

submitted 2 months ago by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/interestingasfuck@lemmy.world

121 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 74 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

IMO, better to get consumer protection laws in place early and refine them over time, than not at all.

The longer these things wait, the more time corpos have to get their influence in and either stop the efforts or water them down to be entirely ineffective.

Edit: Don't forget to read about it. https://www.globallawtoday.com/law/legal-news/2025/06/denmarks-groundbreaking-move-copyright-for-faces-and-voices/

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But rushed and incomplete bills can come with bad implementations that make them useless

-this post is known to the state of California to cause cancer

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I can imagine situations where this is a bad idea, such as making almost all journalism illegal because you don't have to legal right to cover news about an individual.

Hopefully they plan for that.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are long established exceptions for use of copyrighted materials, and journalism is one of them.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Good for Denmark.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 months ago

IMO, better to get laws in place early and refine them over time, than not at all.

So... Move fast and break things?