this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
1068 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

9860 readers
1843 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think most people agree with this idea. There are two basic problems preventing it.

  1. There is a giant gap between what people believe they should be doing and what they'll actually do voluntarily when faced with the slightest inconvenience.

Basically you have to make people do inconvenience things. You can't ask.

For example single-use shopping bags. Everyone understands why they are a problem. Every store sells a reusable alternative. Recyclable paper bags have always been an option. But unless it's regulated, people continue using disposable single use plastic shopping bags.

  1. The problem isn't just what can be recycled it's what WILL be recycled.

Imagine going through construction debris trying to separate plaster, wood-lathing wire-lathing, screws, and insulation into separate piles for disposal.

Picture the average grandma disassembling a sump pump to make sure plastic rubber Teflon and metal materials all end up in separate recyclable piles.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

And this is why bags are no longer free where i live and cost up to 40c a piece. People quickly stopped using them haha
The inconvenience of the price became larger than always having a reusable bag in the car or bike hehe

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We banned them here too. I always forget my reusable bags and toss a loose assortment of goods in my trunk to tumble around.

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Oh, i get one of the cardboard boxes the shops let you take then haha. That and i have 3, reusable bags in the car and a collapsable plastic box to put my shoppings into xD

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

I wish we could pay for them. nope, gotta buy more expensive actual garbage bags that use far far more material

I just need, like, four or five plastic shopping bags a month. that would cover my needs.

instead I'm shovelling dog shit into bread bags that don't quite have a big enough opening

[–] ExtraPartsLeft@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No where does it say that consumers should be required to do these things. Just that if the only end of life possibility for a product is the land fill, then we should restrict it's manufacturing. Obviously there would need to be exceptions for things like medical needs or accessibility accomodations.

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So we don't want to achieve the recycling, repair, and re-use, we just want to know it's theoretically possible?

[–] ExtraPartsLeft@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No where did I say that, you obtuse troll.

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Ad hominem aside... There's a reason we want these things to fall into one of these categories. Presumably it's so that we can actually recycle reuse or compost end of life products.

So, either we want that sump pump disassembled into component level disposal categories so that we can achieve this goal, or we make peace with a disposal plan that involves chucking this in the trash as a fully assembled good that will almost certainly be cost and time prohibitive to dispose of in any other way than tossing it into a landfill.

I'm saying this is a problem and you're saying it's not. You're not identifying a solution to that problem you just name calling... And I'm the troll?