this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
2936 readers
122 users here now
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Dame Rachel de Souza*
Relevant part:
But the rest of the article leaves a rather positive impression, she seems like a passionate and helping gal, even if sometimes this leads to a fuck up like this Online Safety Act. So I don't quite understand what was your point, do you want to blame everything on her? I would say that she wasn't the one making a law without listening to experts calling bullshit, she did take part in it but that's never 100%
I’m not British.
BBC goes a long way not to name her.
Now, take everything you’ve been narrated with, with the fact an encyclopedia needs “greater protections for children” with “robust age limits” as an ❛adult content site❜ that requires “tighter age verification on sites that children already engage with and use.”
I pray I don't need to explain how children are being exploited with this law, instead of being protected.
Oh, the #4 is clear pretty much as usual