The UK's Online Safety Act doesn't just age-gate porn; it blocks material deemed "harmful" to minors. Days after the law went into effect, reports of non-explicit content on social media getting blocked in the region started to crop up. Subreddits from r/IsraelCrimes to r/stopsmoking are now walled in the UK. Video games, Spotify, and dating apps have instituted or will institute age checks.
Given the SCOTUS age verification decision [June '25], Stabile fears that people [in the US] will go "mask off" in the fall and spring, when state legislatures start getting back together. "People are going to attempt to restrict the internet even more aggressively," Stabile said. "I think people are going to work to restrict all sorts of content, particularly LGBTQ content, but also content that is broadly defined as any sort of threat or propaganda to minors." Other experts Mashable spoke to agree with him.
"I'm going to jump to the end step," [Eric Goldman, law professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law] said. "The end step is that most online users are going to be required to age authenticate most of the time they visit websites. That's going to become the norm." In a paper he wrote, Goldman called these statutes "segregate-and-suppress" laws.
The stated reason behind these laws is to "protect children." But as journalist Taylor Lorenz pointed out, in the UK, age verification is already preventing children from accessing vital information, such as about menstruation and sexual assault.
"When we see crackdowns on spaces on the internet, we're essentially stripping away that potential for self-actualization," Goldman said. We've reached the dystopian stage of the internet, he added.
This internet sure. Build an i2p router and the dark web has always been there.
Honestly, I think i preferred the internet when it was small. It was less useful sure, but stumbling on people's passion projects and collections of curios they were hosting was just... nice... Ya know? Probably rose tinted glasses though.
Who says I am happy with the enshitifaction of the interwebs.
I am happy these tools exist. I am not happy that they're necessary. I trying to say that the problem of "how do we host and access services without government impedence" is a solved one.
Most of the content is in America for now. Buy a VPS in the Somalia and host from there.
All I'm saying is through rose tinted glasses, I think I preferred the internet when I was stumbling upon random people's passion projects. A website devoted to some random cat? Sign my RSS right up.
Money getting involved in the internet has destroyed the UX while admittedly increasing utility. Worth it? Maybe, aside from banking, email, maps and Uma musume I don't much engage with corporate internet anymore.
I am Naive? No doubt about it.
What is it that you want from me? Things are shit? I agree. Things will get worse? I agree. I'm naive? I agree. Appeased?
I'll find ways to communicate with other oddballs. While the government is playing whack-a-mole with VPSs, VPNs, i2ps, openWRT, other shit will come around. If not there's meshtastic. If nothing else does, I'll go touch grass I guess.
Corporate internet doesn't interest me over much, so if that's all there is, on I'll move.