this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

Opensource

4771 readers
109 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is. It's the original development team of the project.

The one that got discontinued, you mean? It didn't matter that it was "first party" as it still got the axe. This fork has existed for multiple years now, and may end up having a longer life than the "first party" one had.

This is not uncommon in the open source space.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

it still got the axe

Yes I do remember saying that a few hours ago.

may end up having a longer life than the "first party" one had.

You can "may" anything you want.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good job avoiding my point entirely :)

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't avoid your point at all.

I wasn't discussing what "may" happen. I was discussing what's more likely to happen.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's still something that may happen. Just because you think that third party is more likely to go away doesn't mean it will happen. So yes, you completely avoided my point and continue to do so. You even used "might" earlier. That sounds a lot like may to me.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 months ago