this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
546 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31700 readers
2764 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
  1. We didn’t really have a democratic choice
  2. Most of my countrymen are stupid and proud of it
  3. Most of the people who are aware of how bad it is are not willing to break the law or upset the status quo to fight it
  4. Reform and revolution take organization but that takes time and effort that most can’t afford.
  5. People who were aware of how bad things were and are getting have become exhausted and constantly feel powerless to the point they can’t find the strength to keep trying

Those with the time/wealth/power to do anything are too blind or unsympathetic to do anything real. Those without time and resources lack the resources to do anything influential without organization which they also lack the time and resources to create as well.

We’re already in a dictatorship. But you likely have time to stop your country from following suit. Make sure there are good guys left to beat the shit out of us in the end


Edit: to clarify, by “we didn’t have a democratic choice” I was referring to gerrymandering, vote suppression, and other things like winner take all states. I voted and I know there were a surprising number of people who voted blue despite being lifelong republicans. It didn’t do anything because we don’t have democracy.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  1. We didn’t really have a democratic choice

You had "NOT TRUMP", a former prosecutor with a firm grasp of the law and the progressive half of Biden/Harris. .. who was also Not Trump. If you wanted to ensure Trump didn't get in , the box was right there.

They just needed to vote "not Trump". How fucking hard is that?

Man, this gets hard to repeat so many times.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

"B-but she's a woman!"

[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey love, calm down. I was referring to gerrymandering and vote suppression not the inability to vote for the lesser evil.

I did vote and in fact a surprising number of my peers voted blue despite the fact they typically hard line republican. It made no difference because our state is an all or nothing state, so as long as you can gerrymander well enough around cities and convince rural areas to vote red out of fear, ta da the red party gets all the marbles as if the entire state voted unanimously.

That’s what I meant by not having democracy.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was referring to gerrymandering

For the 273645234th time, gerrymandering does not play a part in a presidential election. Voter suppression, sure. Gerrymandering affects congressional elections.

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, which is why Texas was able to push so many republicans through into congress when votes show that it wasn’t so stark.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Agreeing with the main statement here, but there are knock on effects to gerrymandering. Higher races get fewer votes from places where the elections aren't competitive. With few competitive races there's less benefit to voting, so marginal voters stay home. That's why a motivating ballot question is considered a political benefit.

And gerrymandered states can also give the impression that state level results are a foregone conclusion as well. With the electoral college, where the number of votes on the losing side don't matter, living under a red trifecta creates an impression that the state itself will never flip.

It really gets hard to repeat to you people that voting against someone is how we got trump in the first place. And you want to do more of that?