Mildly Interesting

25774 readers

111 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Zerlyna@lemmy.world

812

Americans overestimate the size of minority groups and underestimate the size of most majority groups (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Wulri@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

270 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source: https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/41556-americans-misestimate-small-subgroups-population

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Imagine thinking 1 in 5 people are trans... Just... This has to be a math understanding issue, right??

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, the survey does not show the distribution of answers. So my guess (it's a guess, not data) is the people living in densely populated areas answered lower numbers, and people living in rural or remote areas ridiculously overestimated the number of trans people based on how much of a big "issue" medias are making of them.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'd honestly believe the opposite, with people living in liberal cities overestimating. Personallt, in a friend group of about 15, 4 are trans.

Just because you're progressive, doesn't mean you're good at math or understand statistics.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

You know, thinking back about how big the number is, it's probably both.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

For sure. Many Americans are confused by percentages. They do not understand that 20% is equivalent to saying "in a room of 100 people, 20 of them are trans", and even if they did understand that, they wouldn't have the proactive reasoning to make sure their percentage estimates add up/overlap in a way that makes sense, e.g not implying that 20 people in the room are all Hispanic Asian atheist Catholic bisexual transgender millionaires.

[–] pajam@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

they wouldn’t have the proactive reasoning to make sure their percentage estimates add up/overlap in a way that makes sense

Yeah the moment I saw 40% Hispanic, I had to go see how they answered on other races. 40 Black, 40 Hispanic, 30 Asian, 60 White. 170%

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, and this is before we even get into availability heuristic biases that would screw over people who do understand percentages. Most people are very bad estimators. If they live in a town with 40% Hispanic people, they're gonna overestimate the total % of Hispanic people.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Perhaps people confuse/conflate it with a more broader category, like https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/nearly-1-5-young-adults-say-they-re-not-straight-n1270003