this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1007 points (95.8% liked)

Political Memes

8757 readers
3274 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IpsumLauren@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago (7 children)

The other four didn't vote because there wasn't a party against genocide.

[–] genapospotted@lemmings.world 1 points 46 minutes ago

Lmao get ready for a dozens smug remarks from genocide voters trying to rationalise their shttiy behavior.

[–] the_elder@midwest.social 10 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Electoral puritanism like this is a big part of why we now have concentration camps in America.

Thanks for that.

[–] genapospotted@lemmings.world 0 points 44 minutes ago

If more little shitards like you considered genocide a dealbreaker they might have considérée the political implication of bombing civilians before coing it

But They just knew they could count on you lot being cowards

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The puritanism is that both parties are fascist.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

Both parties are equally bad, that's why we're letting 65 million Latinos get deported instead of not letting 65 million Latinos get deported. Less genocide is actually just as bad as more genocide

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The camps already existed with Biden, Trump is just putting more money into them

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah the downvotes you're getting really illustrate the three monkeys approach of centrists. Outright denial not only of opinions, but objective facts. Trump immigration policy is just Biden's turned up a notch, but with a lot of performative cruelty thrown in. Biden's immigration policy is just Trump's turned down a notch, with less performative cruelty. Trump vice signals, Biden virtue signaled. But their actual policies on immigration are very very similar.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago) (1 children)

Trump immigration policy is just Biden's turned up a notch, but with a lot of performative cruelty thrown in

So what you're saying is it's not just Biden's turned up a notch, he's doing it differently and much, much worse. The idea that, because both of them are immigration policies that include deportation, they must be the same thing is infantile

One of them is in favor of deporting all of the Latinos, but really it's the same policy lmao

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 minutes ago

Biden ran concentration camps. I'm sorry to have to inform you of this.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And those four are functionally equivalent to people who didn't vote because they're okay with either option

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Genocide is much more like driving off a cliff than having ice cream or not voting.

It's kind of sad that I even have to say this.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I mean if we want a better analogy, Harris represented the "crash the bus into a building" party, and Trump represented the "crash the bus into a building and explode" party. 3 people are voting for building, 4 people are voting for building and explode, and 4 people are saying "I don't care whether we explode."

One of those 4 thinks they're making some kind of statement by saying "I don't want to crash at all, so I won't be voting." He is indistinguishable from the 3 that just don't care

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 hours ago

Single issue voter is still committed to being uncommitted.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

When your main issue isn't on the ballot, it doesn't matter in the election.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The other four didn't think this through because only one party had a subset of their coalition who opposed genocide, and also opposed 2 other genocides: the one Russia perpetrates against Ukraine, and climate change (leaving aside things like, you know, women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights... And not as a case-in-point the internal genocide of poor people when 50,000 Americans will now die from being dropped from Medicaid thanks to a bill that only ~~Republicans~~ the cliff-divers would have passed).

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

There's a genocide on the bus too?

Libs will tell the craziest stories just to avoid reality.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Libs will tell the craziest stories just to avoid reality.

"Avoiding reality is when you use literary devices that are so complex literal children can parse them."

I'm sorry that you can't quite grasp what an analogy is yet. I hope you continue your education at some point.