this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1025 points (95.7% liked)

Political Memes

8757 readers
3274 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 60 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

The ice cream no longer exists. It hasn’t existed for a long time, and no amount of wishing will bring it back.

I want ice cream, too. But before we can have ice cream again, we need to not die.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's QUITTER talk! I'm voting for Rocky Road.

[–] potoo22@programming.dev 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

Brick on the pedal.

[–] Signtist@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

You're right - it's more like one group voting to drive off a cliff and the other voting to just drive really close to the cliff in case we decide to go off on some other vote, but so long as the cliff doesn't win now, we can focus on convincing people ice cream is the better option. We don't, and instead wait 4 more years to complain about the lack of ice cream, but that's a separate problem.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Still better than not voting to not go off the cliff.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is people have voted for ice cream. They have read about people voting for ice cream for years before they were even born.

Lots of people want ice cream but we are at a point where people KNOW the cliff exists. They DO NOT know the ice cream shop exists because all the times they were PROMISED ice cream the bus just stopped at a sewage treatment plant.

The voters are not the problem. They have zero reason to trust the bus driver. Because the bus driver refuses to throw the cliff voters off the bus. Bad optics.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 minutes ago

The voters are not the problem. They have zero reason to trust the bus driver. Because the bus driver refuses to throw the cliff voters off the bus.

The voters chose the bus driver.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Jeez more of this b b both sides same stuff.

[–] Signtist@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

If you think literally saying "they're definitely different, but the difference is smaller than ideal" means "they're the same" then things will never be fixed.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Dude you changed this it from "we want ice cream" to "we want to drive next to the cliff so we can drive off it later". That's not smaller than ideal, you literally changed it both sides the same, just later.

[–] Signtist@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No, I changed it to "one side killing us, the other not, but still leaving it on the table" Which is a huge difference, but still a troubling scenario. Not driving off a cliff is orders of magnitude better than driving off a cliff, but still significantly worse than ice cream.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Dude one side wanted to get ice cream and you changed it to "nah, not that. I'm gonna change it to what the other side wants, just later. Change it to the complete opposite". You completely changed it. Changed everything. Smh. That you either don't want to see that or can't see that... I'm out.

[–] Signtist@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Again, I didn't change it to "later" I changed it to "if the cliff drivers win the next vote, it'll be a short drive." Do you really think that's inaccurate? Look at how Trump drove the country into the ground in his first 4 years, and how easy it was to just keep doing it even after we had 4 years of democratic leadership that was meant to get things back on track. I don't call that "ice cream," I call that "sitting by the cliff waiting for the cliff drivers to be in power again." We need leadership that will drive away from the cliff even if it upsets the people and politicians that want to drive off it.