this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1147 readers
73 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
self@awful.systems
blakestacey@awful.systems
dgerard@awful.systems
44
The New York Times published a hit piece on Mamdami, citing Crémieux (www.mediaite.com)
submitted 11 hours ago by slopjockey@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Found this article on the front page of r/nyc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] istewart@awful.systems 15 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Nitpicking, but at what point do we start calling it race pseudoscience? Letting the creeps have even a tiny bit of legitimacy is too much, especially as mainstream outfits are working overtime to legitimize them.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 7 points 7 hours ago

Nitpicking, but at what point do we start calling it race pseudoscience?

"Hating Black People" would be a more fitting name.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 10 points 8 hours ago

I feel like calling it race pseudoscience inadvertently suggests the existence of legitimate race science.