this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
772 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

72362 readers
2841 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 72 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Years ago, when this policy was first being contemplated, someone at google plugged a number, likely larger than this, into a spreadsheet analyzing the cost/benefit of spying on their customers.

This is just post-activation operating expense from their perspective.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 83 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Google made 100 billion last year.

300 million is barely a blip.

The fine should have been 30 billion.

if the fines arent big enough to seriously hurt a company, Then the fines are not big enough to change their behavior.

They just become a tax on evil.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If you earn like 100k a year its like being slapped with a 300 $ fine just to put it into perspective.

[–] onesixone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 15 hours ago

100k AFTER all your expenses.

[–] glorptex@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

They should definitely be higher than what they are, even the GDPR fines are a joke, its likely added to a line "legal expenses" in their expenses.

While it looks like the EU fines are ramping up over time, it still just feels silly right now. But I guess that is intentional.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Base it not off the entire company, base it off the value of doing this. They didnt make 100 billion off unapproved android user data collection.

This argument is common and while fines should be higher, the idea that they dont matter unless they are 10% of earnings is ridiculous.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Because all the "slap on the wrist" fines have worked so well to modify corporate rapism... /s

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah I'd agree that there is a lack of enforcement in some aspects but moreso a lack of regulation and legislation in others.

There needs to be a better commitment to addressing trends in capitalism than reacting to their overstepping.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

These fines worked in 1957.

They don't work today.

Its not an overreach to increase fines to a relative point commiserate with current earnings, so that they can actually harm a company and by doing so discourage future illicit behavior.

To try and claim otherwise is some corpo rat bullshit.

These fines come on the heels of willful behavior, that they believe they can make money off of even accounting for the fines.. Which turns the fine into nothing more than a tax. With higher fines, that can destroy their profits and damage their company, they won't be so eager to pencil evil into the expense line.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I'm 70 years old and that still hasn't happened. Bring back the guillotine, I say. Anything less is just the price of a permit.