this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
48 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2027 readers
243 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is why I absolutely cannot fucking stand creative work being referred to as "content". "Content" is how you refer to the stuff on a website when you're designing the layout and don't know what actually goes on the page yet. "Content" is how you refer to the collection of odds and ends in your car's trunk. "Content" is what marketers call the stuff that goes around the ads.

"Content"... is Whatever.

I was going to make a comment on the Stubsack thread about how it kind of ticks me off how "content creator" has permeated its way so deep into the vernacular. I can forgive it when it's used as a clumsy term to talk about creative workers across multiple media, but something like a video essayist calling another video essayist a content creator just gives me the ick. Have some pride and solidarity in your art form, for fuck's sake.

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I hate to be a language prescriptivist, and I fully recognise that times change, language evolves. But I can't help but feel frustrated and disappointed that this term become the norm. Everyone has latched on to it, unaware of the connotation, I think. And now it's here, it feels like it'll never go away.

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Geordi, disgusted: being a _con_tent creator

Geordi, interested: being a con_tent_ creator

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 12 hours ago

discontent creator