this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
84 points (98.8% liked)
Linux
8223 readers
292 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They are essentially doing the same as KDE, whose statement was linked in the article.
KDE
VS
Gnome
Edit - added Gnome quote effectively saying the same thing.
Even here the KDE communication is better on details. the gnome quote is less crisp on what it means by "active development" where as KDE precisely defines what will and will not be supported
That and if you go on the gnome forums, their attitude IMO seems openly hostile to.. almost everything and everyone.
Odds are they're doing the same thing only in theory. In practice, the picture changes - typically the KDE devs are far more willing to maintain old and marginal features and/or support benefiting only a small chunk of the userbase. While the GNOME devs are way more likely to ditch it, babble something about their design vision, then try to convince the user "ackshyually you don't need it".
(A major exception is perhaps accessibility, mentioned in the text. It isn't just the Wayland devs worried about it, but also the KDE and GNOME devs. In this regard props to all three.)
Gnome and KDE are not doing the same thing.
KDE will continue to offer an X11 session for the time being:
https://pointieststick.com/2025/06/21/about-plasmas-x11-session/
Gnome will disable the X11 session in the next release and then remove the code:
https://blogs.gnome.org/alatiera/2025/06/08/the-x11-session-removal/