this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
917 points (97.9% liked)

science

19489 readers
1535 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Changed to a non-plagerizing link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 24 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

A hard truth is that if you see an executive pushing return to office, you know one of two things about them. One of the following is true.

  1. They are terrible at finance and don't understand the sunk-cost fallacy. They have to keep using that building they bought; they've spent so much on it and simply can't bring themselves to sell it.

  2. They're a sexual molester. They're someone that uses the power of their position to coerce sex out of their employees. Fucking their employees is their primary motivation for not retiring early right now. You can't coerce your secretary to give you a blowjob over Zoom.

That's really it. They're either bad at business or they're a sexual predator. If you see an executive pushing return to office, be sure to ask them which one of these they are. Because they're definitely one or the other.

[–] unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
  1. Tradition.
  2. Belief that work-from-home is less efficient.
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Those are both covered under 'bad at business'.

[–] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

As well as being a sexual monster. A lot of tradition is built around reinforcement of sexist gender roles.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So

  1. They're morons and terrible at business.
[–] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Honestly I think your first point is just a subset of something larger and even more basic - "we've always done it this way. Change is scawwy. Different bad. Are you implying I was wrong before?" Etc.