this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
643 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

70919 readers
3236 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just a little bit more privacy invasion. C'mon, juuuust a little.. 'till you no longer notice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is what makes me excited for Linux phones to finally become viable. Every major phone manufacturer is making their UX worse and expanding their hidden spyware for the sake of profits.

Graphene os is great but you can only install it on a Pixel. But they give extended support for older devices which is nice. HOWEVER, people are making Linux builds for even older devices, including the iphone 6. Getting a new phone after 7 years might not be necessary in the future.

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

You could just use a phone not made by a major manufacturer.

I have one from Orbic and it's great.

[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Do Orbic devices* run anything aside from stock android?

[–] propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe 1 points 15 hours ago

I don't know, but it looks like my phone has something pretty close to stock.

load more comments (1 replies)