this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
75 points (82.6% liked)

politics

23874 readers
3311 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Contrary to what left-wing optimists had hoped, Democratic nonvoters in 2024 appear to have been less progressive than Democrats who voted. For instance, Democratic nonvoters were 14 points less likely to support banning assault rifles, 20 points less likely to support sending aid to Gaza, 17 points less likely to report believing that slavery and discrimination make it hard for Black Americans, 17 points more likely to support building a border wall with Mexico, 20 points more likely to support the expansion of fossil fuel production, and, sadly for economic populists, 16 points less likely to support corporate tax hikes (though this group still favored corporate tax hikes by a three to one margin). Overall, nonvoting Democrats were 18 points less likely to self-identify as “liberal” or “very liberal.” Here is a point for the centrists.

After spending months blaming actual leftists, it turns out it was just regular Democrats that were okay with giving Trump the presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BoycottPro@lemm.ee 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Just make voting mandatory and give people time off to vote. Read about Australia's voting system. It's really awesome and I wish we could have something like that here.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People refuse mandatory vaccines, can you imagine what they'd do with mandatory voting?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Give people a tax rebate for voting.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd rather not have people who don't support any candidate checking the first box or making a random selection to get a tax rebate.

Actually studies show in general people take it seriously. Thought that if youre going to "have to" do it you may as well vote for someone you want.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Right now non-voters are essentially checking a quantum waveform of a box, that collapses to endorsement of the eventual winner.

Id much rather they make a choice, even a random one.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not an awful idea, but I'm sure someone would claim it's bribery...

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago

Bribery to hand in a blank ballot isn't a big deal when we're have Felon Musk actually bribing to favor a specific party.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

In Australia, even the lamest request to cancel the fine will be accepted by the government. The minor slap on the wrist just keeps everyone honest and for the most part politically aware.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

Seriously. We need mandatory federal voting holidays with democracy sausages being offered at every polling station.

[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Doesn't Australia also have problems with far right nut jobs though?