this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

20663 readers
89 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
UlrikHD@programming.dev
19
Why does Codeberg use Woodpecker CI? (programming.dev)
submitted 1 week ago by staircase@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Title really, but some comments ...

I'm likely to move to Codeberg, and I like the idea of a CI system that I can run locally, without tie-in to a particular code hosting vendor. But why this over e.g. Jenkins, or whatever other systems there are these days? I'm new to Woodpecker.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Kissaki@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Probably because it's much simpler to integrate than Jenkins.

Their own CI system 'Actions' is in open alpha.

Honestly, I'm glad they didn't use Jenkins. Managing it is a convoluted mess. (I don't have experience with Woodpecker CI nor with Forgejo Actions in particular, though.)

[โ€“] staircase@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm torn between using woodpecker and trying out their new CI. I love the idea of no vendor tie-in, but I also want an easy time