this post was submitted on 26 May 2025
1109 points (99.5% liked)

memes

15012 readers
3448 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That makes sense. If you’re going that route though you should be fairly safe patent wise I would think? Most of the dot matrix patents, if not all, have to be expired by now?

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

I'm not a lawyer, but I would expect so.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You would still need to explore patents. Just because patents exist, doesn't mean they are in use. I would not be surprised to find out that a company like HP would hunt down and buy any patents that could interfere with its profits just to prevent others from using them.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why would you need to worry about patents on something that is free and open source

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Patent infringement is about use, not price

It’s total bullshit that stifles innovation but such is life in the USA. At least the period isn’t completely obscene like copyright