this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
169 points (98.8% liked)

Television

1088 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities


Other Television Communities

:

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.

  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.

  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.

  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.

  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.

  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags. ****

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Bond and Dexter improved by straying from the source material (up to a point). Bourne trilogy is better for ignoring the disguise element.

But in general you are correct.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

Good point.

I thinknwe could say those creative teams still clearly love their source material, even as they deviated from it.

A great adaptation feels like a valid alternate take on the original story, rather than expressing complete disdain for the original story.

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

I think to know where to deviate from source requires a thorough understanding of and appreciation for it first.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I think the Watchmen movie is the only example I can think of where deviating from the source material was actually a good thing. Even then, it was a tempered change that still captured everything else about the comic, and they didn't try to "fix" anything else.

You don't make a successful book-to-movie project that makes millions of dollars by shitting on the source material that already made millions of dollars. Hollywood writers are egotistical assholes that do not make millions of dollars. The book was successful for a reason. Don't fuck up a good thing.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I agree with your point, but the lack of

spoilerdead fake space squid

was still a silly, unnecessary and confusing change. It completely lost the critical "look out, they are coming for you from space" aspect, which is the only way his plan might have worked.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Man I don't think I could disagree with a comment more. He captured nothing about the comic. He missed the point entirely.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Can you expand? I thought it was pretty much shot for shot, except the exchange of common external enemy and exclusion of pirates.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Agreed.

But how does the TV series fit into that?