this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

11342 readers
169 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


📆 F1 Calendar
🏁 FIA Documents


2026 Calendar

Location Date
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan 24-26 Sep
🇸🇬 Singapore 09-11 Oct
🇺🇸 USA (Austin) 23-25 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico 30 Oct-01 Nov
🇧🇷 Brazil 06-08 Nov
🇺🇸 USA (Las Vegas) 19-21 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar 27-29 Nov
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi 04-06 Dec

Rules

1. Be respectful.
Treat drivers, teams, and fellow Lemmings with respect. Healthy debate is encouraged, but keep it civil and constructive.

2. No duplicate news.
Please check the feed before posting. Multiple posts from different news companies reporting the exact same thing will be removed to keep the feed clean.

3. Spoilers.
This is a live sports community. We discuss sessions in real-time, so browse at your own risk during race weekends!

4. Make content accessible.
Non-English articles: Include a translated summary (e.g., DeepL).
Paywalled articles: Provide a brief summary in the comments.

5. Social media.
Post social media updates as screenshots so everyone can view them without needing an account. Always include the original source link.

6. Zero tolerance for spam. Strictly no gambling, crypto, or NFT-related content.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ahead of Imola, the FIA confirmed that everything it discovered from its forensic checks of the McLaren braking systems was completely above board – meaning it’s back to square one for McLaren’s rivals in trying to figure out just what clever engineering is going on.

It’s since emerged that three separate technical directives were issued to the teams last week, on Monday 12th of May, just a few days before Imola.

TD006A relates to the design of wheel bodywork and tyre treatment, and it’s understood that the correspondence between Red Bull and the FIA regarding its queries about McLaren’s braking system was also shared with all the teams.

Sources have indicated that this TD merely clarified design ideas in the area of tyre treatment, such as those relating to the use of water cooling, would not be allowed – there is no indication that any such systems were in use by any team.

Pre-emptive clarifications and rule changes are nothing new – last year, a mid-season regulation change banned asymmetrical braking systems, with the governing body confirming that there was never any evidence that any team was using such a system.

TD039M pertains to skid block design and is also related to clarifications on how the depth of the plank is measured in scrutineering.

These clarifications pertain to mounting patterns and material usage. Similarly to the wing flexibility tests, these changes are to tighten up the teams’ potential abilities to hit the wear limits of the plank while still passing the minimum thickness checks and, in theory, could have meant some teams needing to raise their cars to not fall foul of the revised checks.

A third technical directive relates to a clarification on how the front floor bodywork flexibility tests are carried out, and is understood to be of particularly minor significance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eksb@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Revealed: The first word of every PlanetF1 headline

[–] eksb@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Uncovered: the man who stole PlanetF1's thesaurus