this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
7 points (60.0% liked)
Lemmy.world Support
3406 readers
17 users here now
Lemmy.world Support
Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.
This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.
This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.
To open a support ticket
You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email [email protected] (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.
Follow us for server news ๐
Outages ๐ฅ
https://status.lemmy.world/
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ahh this is great thank you.
I still don't see how to find out who is down voting what?
Also wow, look at this:
Some mod took action based on this and perma-banned them across the board! Based entirely on @[email protected], frankly, completely baseless speculation.
Whoever that mod is should be removed.
The username associated with every vote, up or down, is available through the ActivityPub API. If your instance doesn't show them (and I believe lemmy instances don't by default) some helpful soul has built a tool to view them. Sometimes it fails for reasons unknown, but it lets you see who's up or down voted a particular post or comment. I believe nom-lemmy interfaces like kbin also show you that information.
Hi, I made this tool. What posts don't work? And I am aware the user option doesn't work, I'm working on fixing it.
Thanks for making it, it's a really handy tool for understanding who's responding to posts.
One post I can't get the votes for is: https://lemm.ee/post/24727759 I'm guessing that's because the community is on a different server, but I can't see an obvious way to get a link to the comment on it's home server when I'm browsing mine. It would be great if there's a way to resolve the correct server via the API, or at least report why it couldn't get the votes.
This post is older than my instance, that's why votes won't fetch
Aha! That makes sense. Thanks again for a handy tool.
Wow, great tool!
You have to be a moderator and use "view votes" from the mod menu, and then they will show up at the bottom of the post.
Moderator or administrator?
Also, if its as simple as connecting to the fediverse to expose these data, it seems weird to keep it hidden.
Just a mod, afaik. I am not an admin of any instance, but I do mod a few comms. But your instance also has to federate that data and to do that has to be on whatever version that added it (I am not sure what version did this tho). If your instance runs some older version of Lenny, it has nothing to show.
I actually find it weird that it's not hidden from the public, since that's unusual. Obviously everything of this nature is tracked (it has to be to work) but it's usually something only an operator of the thing would have access to.
I'm not sure where I sit on it. On one hand, it's nice to be able to have proof of vote manipulation and not just have to take a mod/admin's word for it, but on the other it could easily lead to abuse/harassment.
Did you build the bot?
Are you sure you know what you are seeing? Because its pretty obvious that you dont.
The bot didn't take action until after this post was up. The bot also cites this thread as the justification for the action. Its obviously scripted to just do whatever a mod/ admin tells them to do.
Again. No credible evidence of vote manipulation has been presented.
Just one user from a single user instance providing their conjecture, and some mod acting on that conjecture.
Look, apparently the deletion of my comment didn't federate quick with enough. I saw your other comments and realized I have no interest in engaging with you, and the comment you just made is why.
So, pretend I'm saying whatever it takes to end the conversation here, because I tried to undo starting it.
Whatever dude. The hot took action based on this post, not on evidence of suspicious activity.