this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
1195 points (100.0% liked)

196

19133 readers
579 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

you didn't want her to be happy before she was a transphobe?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe they were only aware of Rowling once her transphobia came to light?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

come on dude, everyone knows harry potter

Everyone knows a popular book series.

Not everyone knows, or even cares about the author.

[–] BlastboomStrice@mander.xyz 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lol, that might be me, almost. I knew the movies and books existed (I think I have watched one), but I kinda doubt I remembered the writer's name. Just few years ago I made a friend who critisized the writer about her transphobic views and that's kinda how I got to know her😅

(I have to admit, I'm bad at watching movies/series or reading literature and just few years ago I tried to start reading literature systematically.)

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is that the guy who runs the ceramics shop down the road?

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, he sells great jars. Check them out sometime.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Considering whats in her books I always knew she was at least a tad bit bigoted

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's the Gringotts bankers being a grotesque antisemitic stereotype straight out of Nazi propaganda, there's the racist caricature character names, there's the fact that only one character in the entire wizarding world is against slavery and she drops the subject forever after everyone makes fun of her for it, probably other shit I'm not remembering right now..

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There’s the Gringotts bankers being a grotesque antisemitic stereotype straight out of Nazi propaganda

If it's like in the movies this sound like a stretch, pretty much every fantasy has something like this

there’s the fact that only one character in the entire wizarding world is against slavery

Isn't dobby being freed from his slavery and help herry one of the main event in the story?

[–] Hexbatch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

In my head canon: Dobby was killed by the author because he was the one elf to reject slavery.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

"uppity little fucker!" -- Rowling's internal monologue

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Why would you think that? Dobby is one of the best characters in the story, he was freed from slavery by Harry and he gave his life to save him

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Normal fantasy stuff like species representing racial stereotypes and slavery (yeah I don't get why it's "normal" in fantasy, she also did it worse then most others)

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I would go so far as to say that most fantasy works that have slavery have either a "The world is an awful place everywhere, at all times, in all things" tone, or a "Slavery is BAD" tone. Whereas Rowling went for "Aktually, the slaves are happy and you shouldn't try to help them"

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

So are you making an argument against all fantasies?

[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

Shaun made a good Video about the bigotry and liberal naivety of the Harry Potter series (including some pointings to her other works)

She's always been a "new labour" type. There were certainly people who disliked her before she went full TERF.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

I personally assumed she already was, and I don't actively wish happiness on people who already experience it. But that's just me

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Maybe just didn't care one way or another. It's just a joke, though.