this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
2 points (66.7% liked)

News Summary

214 readers
19 users here now

News feed with AI summary.

Rules:

  1. follow instance rules
  2. Engage in good faith discussion
  3. Tag relevant posts with [Meta] or [Request]
  1. No calls for actionable violence
  2. Congratulations your behavior is now a new rule

Credit:
Community icon @Alice@hilariouschaos.com

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com
AINewsBot@hilariouschaos.com
2
‘It’s about time NATO be shut down’, says Vijay Prashad (www.aljazeera.com)
submitted 1 year ago by AINewsBot@hilariouschaos.com to c/news_summary@hilariouschaos.com
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Author: Unknown
Published on: 23/04/2025 | 00:00:00

AI Summary:
NATO has suffered major setbacks in recent years, from its inability to prevent Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to the end of a 20-year war in Afghanistan that saw the Taliban return to power. So, is NATO still relevant? Could it even stand a chance against any sort of confrontation with China?

Original: 90 words
Summary: 51 words
Percent reduction: 43.33%

I'm a bot and I'm open source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ukraine has never been a part of NATO, so stopping Russia wasn't their job. The US, France, and Russia agreed to defend Ukraine, not NATO. Afghanistan was rolled like a cheap rug. Holding it was never NATO's job or goal.

No NATO country has ever suffered Russian aggression. Which is NATO's job. So 100% success to date.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

well put - it's a series of strawman arguments followed by a concern-troll "is NATO still relevant? Could it even stand a chance against any sort of confrontation with China?"

to the idiot dumbfuck who wrote this, NATO is the north ATLANTIC, China ain't there.