Politics

1297 readers

125 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

Monitor every stock trade Congress and the White House makes

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes (www.scotusblog.com)

submitted 1 year ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in the first of two cases in April involving religion and public schools. In Mahmoud v. Taylor a coalition of parents from Montgomery County, Md., contend that requiring their children to participate in instruction that includes LGBTQ+ themes violates their religious beliefs and thus their First Amendment right to freely exercise their religion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Gotcha, tolerate their intolerance. Isn't that how we got the current regime?

Also, kids won't be taught tolerance and inclusion but will somehow learn it despite being raised in an environment of intolerance and exclusion? Gtfo with that bullshit