this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
933 points (98.8% liked)
Microblog Memes
7533 readers
2152 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We absolutely do not need to demand proof that he is a "family man". That is the "innocent" part of "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law". The onus is on the state to prove he committed a crime. End of story.
In a court of law, yes, presumed innocence is the neutral state. In the court of public opinion, though, presuming innocence flips an "out-group = enemy" switch in their heads. Everything you say from that point is heard through their lizard brain telling them that you are a threat.
We do not have the luxury of holding the people currently in power to the rules. We don't have the luxury of ignoring the crazy person in the room, either. We have to engage on their terms, else they flip the table and walk away still in power, still on the war path.
They do, however, have the capacity for rational thought. The calmer you can keep them, the sooner their rationality will tell them that human rights apply to everyone or none at all.