Conservative and Conservative2
A community for some conservative points of view. Including general news.
Warning: I have reported, and will keep reporting, extreme posts on Lemmy to the FBI. This is the webpage used to report federal crimes and submit tips regarding violence against elected officials, and domestic terrorism activity. https://tips.fbi.gov/home
Rule 0: Serial downvoters will be banned.
🍃🌻 Rule 1: Kindly be empathetic and kind to others. Trolling and spamming will not be tolerated.
Rule 2: Keep it Civil - It’s NOT OK to say another USER is a (pejorative) or a paid (pejorative).
Making the community a friendly & supportive place is our goal.
All of us are here for a short lifetime. Let’s have a nice time here and avoid negativity. :)
Please be respectful, even if you don't agree.
Don't personally attack people. Don't call them names.
Be grown-ups.
view the rest of the comments
That doesn't mean pay off TOTAL national debt. It's like you selling your motorcycles to pay off debt. Doesn't have to mean all of it, just paying it down.
Fair point. Let's take a slightly deeper look. The annual interest on the US national debt is approaching $1 TRILLION. Any number starting with "M" amounts less than a tenth of one percent of that. So it won't "pay down" anything, it will just add a tiny drop in the bucket to one year's interest. I haven't done any math to estimate the problems resulting from putting a shitload more guns into circulation, but my guess it they would cost more than the benefits. But that's like, just my opinion, man.
Agreed. But just like paying off personal debt, "any" is more than "none," so I have no problems with it.
I do have problems with both parties wasting money and getting us into debt in the first place, though.
Like I said tho - cost/benefit analysis. Introducing what I assume is a huge number of confiscated guns into the population will create costs downstream, not just moar freedom.