politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
da fuq? It's the definition of "center". It's the literal way we measure political leanings.
One problem is that when it comes to individual issues, Americans are fairly to the left of Democrats. But when it comes to politicians or broad policies, Americans are to the RIGHT of Democrats. The American voting population is stupid, and they don't consider individual issues (and in most cases, never vote on them via ballot measures etc). Also, a lot of policies are given the broad label of "reform", and Americans have very different ideas of what "reform" means. "Immigration reform" could mean anything from an open border policy to immediate execution of any illegal immigrants. Most Americans support "reform" though.
So, half of the Taliban is left wing? Half of the third Reich was left wing? No, the center of office holders is not how we measure political leanings. You can go with political theory that defines left and right in a pretty fixed way, or you can go by the center of the population. By either of those standards, the Democrats are moderate right wing.
There is nothing particularly "stupid" about Americans. They are just flawed humans, and there is a reason for the mismatch between where they fall on issues and where they fall on (let's call them) themes. The themes come from the narratives they receive from our two right wing parties. Ask them about particular issues and they think like individuals. Ask them about themes and they line up with the narratives coming to them from our two right wing parties.
Yes. There's no universal human left vs right. Political ideologies change over time and place. The far left wing in the Taliban is roughly similar to the far right wing in America.
Gonna have to disagree there.
Damn. So, no right wing government exists or has ever existed will ever exist or could ever exist. What a clever model you dreamt up. No wonder you find it so easy to defend establishment Democrats. Everyone is just as good as everyone else if just put in the right context. You are certainly right about the math. It's a pretty damn useless way to model the world though.
No "-wing" government exists except in relation to something else. That's a fundamental feature of reality. The current US government is more right wing than I would like. It's more right wing than most of Europe. It's more right wing (though not by as much as you think) than the US population would like. It's less right wing than Saudi Arabia, or the Taliban.
And, of course, not all governments map perfectly to the left-right dynamic as we view it in the West. It's a mostly useful metric though.
And, of course, there's a difference between what people would want if they could wave a magic wand and make it so, vs what the people will support as politically achievable. That's a big thing the Left fails to realize about the more centrist Democratic majority: yes, we want universal healthcare. Yes, we want strong unions. Yes, we want equal treatment for all under the law. Yes, we want higher taxes on the rich. Yes, we want monopolies broken up. A lot of us (maybe a majority?) even want worker ownership of the means of production. But we recognize that given the strong opposition to any progress, it's just not possible to get those things immediately and without reservation. We advocate advancing towards those things as quickly as is practically feasible, while preventing backsliding from the opposition.
So asking people "what they want" without the context of what is feasible will give you answers that seem to support more radical Leftists when in reality the people giving those answers are going to vote for Harris, Biden, Warren, Pelosi, Obama, Newsom, etc. and not whatever random no-name 3rd party candidate the Socialists or Greens or whatever the flavor of the day is puts up.