this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
73 points (97.4% liked)

Futurology

2515 readers
115 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

I guess I’m in the minority then, and that’s fine by me.

  • AI generated meeting notes make it easy to produce summaries and action items for all parties, including those who couldn’t make the meeting
  • I can give Copilot a few sentences recounting a story and what key points I want to convey in an essay and it writes most of it for me, often in a more professional sounding tone than I would have written. I spend 5 minutes in the front and 5 minutes on the back and it cuts down the remaining 30 minutes to hour it would have taken.
  • I’ve used it to find and replace portions of code and XML. I’ve used it to redact PII in user stories. I’ve used it to assist me in making SOWs and help content more clear and robust.
  • Education is using it to help identify college students who need more support prior to dropping out.
  • Biologists recently used it to help determine the folding patterns of nearly every protein that does or could exist, which will likely lead to very precise medications that combat cancers and illnesses.
  • Per a recent Malcolm Gladwell podcast I heard, fire chiefs can now use AI to listen to multiple radio channels at the same time in a large fire fighting scenario and have it identify firefighters who are in the most distress, therefore mitigating risk and saving lives.

AI is buzzy now, and buzz deserves a healthy bit of scrutiny. As we move down the hype curve, I think we’ll achieve a certain threshold that’s going to vastly improve the human experience and perhaps improve how we live with rest of this planet too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

AI generated meeting notes make it easy to produce summaries and action items for all parties, including those who couldn’t make the meeting

I'm only familiar with the Zoom version of this, but every time I've seen it used, it made so many mistakes that I would never trust it.

Maybe it's okay in certain scenarios, but it's like having someone taking notes that has no understanding of the context (our project, industry, etc).

Edit: I should emphasise the worst part. A human with no context would write "(something technical about GPUs that I don't understand)", whereas the AI confidently makes up some bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I've not used zoom but the copilot (teams premium) version of this isn't much better.

I've had it imagine extra points of discussion that never happened. I've had it add names of people to the summary that not only weren't in the meeting but aren't known to any of the participants.

At first look it is very impressive and we were able to convince the business to purchase the licences. But now that we try to rely on it, we find we have to fully scrutinize the output. Sometimes having to relisten to the recorded meeting to check accuracy.

I've resorted to making my own notes and then comparing with the AI summary. But then I ask myself what's the point?

load more comments (8 replies)