this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
365 points (99.7% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3481 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Where are you coming up with this? The Romans were not accepting of homosexuality as they thought it was Greek. They especially looked down on man boy relationships. At least for the praticians. Perhaps for the plebs it as less frowned upon.

https://oxfordre.com/politics/politics/abstract/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1243

[–] reminiscensdeus@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To me that abstract indicates that acceptance of homosexuality was lower in the empire than in the Republic, and even lower in the late empire. However it still sounds like it had some level of acceptance significantly higher than medieval europe or even a hundred years ago. The comment you're responding to said "more accepting" not accepting.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I don't have the patience to get into this argument again, but the abstract is not saying what you think it is.