this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
1 points (55.6% liked)
Australian Politics
1483 readers
81 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
News to me!
Soon-to-be voters should probably consider statements like this themselves, as they're of course highly subjective. I'll admit to knowing comparatively little about the position of each party on Israel/Palestine stuff so I'll have to leave a direct reply to that one to someone else, but having inadequate environmental policy is, subjectively, an extremist position. I can now label Labor and the Coalition extremist parties 🙃
The way the preferences can occasionally be quite strategic (due to candidate elimination and flow-on votes) is an interesting phenomenon though.
He's apparently a writer for the Herald Sun and Australian. Thats enough for me to discount anything he says immediately as probably skewed if not outright false, until he proves otherwise. Believe it or not they, (Murdoch Propagandists), can, rarely, make levelheaded comments. Its a rare sight though.
Title seems deliberate, and a little hyberbolic, in an attempt to mislead readers as to the articles subject matter.
The article reads like a friendly disagreement among friends. Where one friend has a brainfart their muddled mind construes as profound then has to express it, thus demonstrating his knowledge and command of a subject to all around.
Classic lazy partisan writing.
Assertion of non-specific associations. Using language indicating those associations as deplorable to the unbelievably extreme.
But all too often turns out to be literally unbelievable. With comparisons easily made about all other actors, in this case Labor/Liberal/Nats/etc, when judged by the same skewed grounds these allegations have been laid.
One massive problem with this type of shitscoop writing is, when a truly disgusting association comes to light of some heinous group/individual and some political entity, be it individuals or Party, the languages impact has been minimised due to its low bar for deployment.