Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- [email protected] - International and local legal news.
- [email protected] - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- [email protected] - Fascinating articles, captivating images, satisfying videos, interesting projects, stunning research and more.
- [email protected] - News and information about Europe.
Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].
view the rest of the comments
Is this a cut off your nose kind of thing again?
The way I see it: US consumer wants Chinese thing, pays China. With tariffs US government goes: "Hey, we don't do that over here, pay me" - US customer also pays US government.
US customer ends up paying more for the same thing.
Now to the tricky part:
If economic theory works and thing costs what it's worth, this means tariffed consumer is overpaying and leaving margin for others to fill. A domestic producer could then make a profit even when not as efficient as the Chinese, cool.
But, a lot of things China does aren't currently made in the US, factories have to be built, some things won't be viable at higher prices (maybe not many enough would pay $99 for a phone cover), and some things will never be able to be produced cheaper (no child labor, expensive adult labor).
So it would take quite some effort to first figure out if it's viable to produce in the US and then to build the production in the US. It also takes quite a lot of time, years probably. Will the tariffs stay that long? If unsure, why risk wasting the effort. If sure, how will the years of punishing prices affect consumers?
that is why I think this tariff thing is not an attack on other countries but just a way for trump to collect more tax from americans, since they have no choice but to buy from china. Trump collects more tax from Americans while making them think he is attacking foreign countries. lol.
In reality, Trump Threatens 104% “GST” tax (tariffs) increase on American for buying imports from China. It is just a fancy GST/VAT tax that discriminate based on country.
you need to stop wearing underwear on your head while thinking.
You talk a lot about Economic Theory considering you completely ignored one crucial detail: consumers won't buy it if the price gets high enough. This could effectively become an Embargo, and it should because Fuck China.
US Consumer will still buy it if it is essential/critical. If it gets high enough they will travel out of US to buy it. Example people travel overseas for medical treatment/surgery/medication/products. Because even after including ticket price and hotel stay it is still cheaper overseas than in US. It might even open up new smuggling trade. Everyone bags are going to be checked more thoroughly in US.
Because of how cheap thing are outside US people may start traveling to SEA/china/Samerica and etc more for shopping, boosting their travel industries and economies. These countries can charge special (tax) on american tourist to collect more money, it will still be cheaper than buying in US.
You need to learn how to put on your shoes.
I seem to have mentioned this.
If that is the case it's kind of an own goal; China is still free to trade with anyone, including US consumers that pay more. It's just the US consumers gwtting worse access to thw products they want. Closer to a self embargo, no?
It's like a much more expensive "Buy American" campaign, only it also makes the US utterly untrustworthy in any future trade deals or investments.
If the USA embargoes have no effect as you claim then certainly a lot of hooting and hollering over the last century about the exact topic seems pointless in hindsight.