this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

Legal News

658 readers
1 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

The "democratic public order" argument is not used for the rulling, just the enforcement mechanism (i.e. the ban being immediate). Which in and of itself is not novel, just rarely used.

Novel or not it just plainly makes sense. If you can suspend the rulling via appeal process it effectively becomes null and void since the rulling is time sensitive.

It's also fitting, since her party and she personally argued for this exact mechnicism to be used by all courts in corruption cases.