this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
9 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1483 readers
113 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Silicon-carbon batteries have been widely accepted by the Korean giant’s Chinese competitors, giving them the freedom to cram in substantially larger capacities in devices without compromising the thickness.

I am surprised this is the first time I am hearing about this and that all smartphone companies haven't already adopted this technology.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's more expensive, it's right there in the article...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's refering to the solid state battery tech that Samsung is considering for some smaller devices. To my knowledge, Chinese OEMs haven't yet adopted this tech.

With silicon-carbon batteries, it seems design considerations play a bigger role, but that still doesn't really explain why Apple and Samsung have been relatively slow with adopting this battery tech (relative to Chinese OEMs).