this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
12 points (77.3% liked)
[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social
1092 readers
2 users here now
COMM HAS MOVED TO !tankiejerk@piefed.social
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thats dangerously close to the "no true scotsman" fallacy.
It isn't close to, it is the no true Scotsman fallacy.
"No true Scotsman" is about redefining a term to suit the argument, not that purity tests or gatekeeping are inherently illegitimate.
their end goal is state capitalism though, so I don't see the contradiction
Yeah. If they call the current state of China with literal billionaires, communist, then they aren’t communist in any economically defined sense of the world
It's only a fallacy when used wrong