this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
326 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45370 readers
4364 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

China, Japan, and South Korea agreed to jointly respond to U.S. tariffs after holding their first economic dialogue in five years, Chinese state media reported.

The meeting focused on reinforcing regional trade ties and countering potential disruptions from new U.S. tariffs expected to be announced by Trump on "liberation day."

The three countries committed to strengthening supply chain cooperation, improving export control dialogue, and pursuing a high-level trilateral free trade agreement.

They also discussed mutual interests in semiconductor trade amid ongoing tensions with the U.S. and among themselves.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Got disillusioned with shit back around ‘99 or so, got tired of rotwing arrogant ignorance, and having lived in a former Soviet republic for several years decide that the US needed its comeuppance. Now I get to watch it all happen. Maybe a good ole fashioned occupation by another country will finally break the backs of the ignorant and lazy for a while.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There isn't a country in the world that could occupy the US. The best option for the word is to just separate us like a cancer, and just forget the US exists like a "dead zone" or something.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Theoretically Canada and Mexico could both lets say China use them as a staging point. Us would in my opinion fall in a few days and the US is actually doing its best to aggro all three of them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Im sorry, but no. Hard no, absolutely not.

  1. US would have home field advantage.
  2. US has ~350 million people, and even more guns.
  3. the US is also absolutely huge, creating logistics and movement issues.
  4. China still can't really project power yet. 5)China has an aging population with less youth, meaning that huge population won't be that useful for invasion, while almost all 350 million Americans would be on def.

It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would seriously be more effective to just isolate us in a box and move on with the world.

Yep, hang back and watch as ramped corruption takes hold and guts the American military (Along with everything else), just at it gutted the Russian military (And society).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Plus we'll be fighting ourselves. If someone invades, we're fighting them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

All the US guns in circulation I think would be useless against actual military weapons/vehicles, it would be air strikes against a guy with a rifle. (maybe hit and run tactics after the fact red dawn style is when they'd be of more use).

Yeah it's big but missiles and artillery have stupid ranges now and the Chinese really aren't lacking in numbers.

The advantages I'd give the US are the F22 should be better than any fighter China has but the J-20 isn't that far away and the F22 hasn't a lot of missiles.

Also it would be very hard to move that amount of troops and equipment without the US catching on but definetly not impossible, shipping containers could probably do it.

Last advantage is I don't think China would have any interest in actually invading the US they'd just sell their dollar reserves if they wanted to do serious damage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

The US also has the first and second biggest air forces.