this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
1571 points (92.3% liked)

memes

20589 readers
1382 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Science does not seek to argue against religion, it seeks nothing, it's just a word to describe a system for finding truth if that's what you're after.

That is what I said, yes. Glad we're on the same page.

So the reason you're seeing people using science to attack religion

The thing we both agreed science is not meant for. Go on.

is because YOU STARTED IT BY EQUATING THEM.

The meme was equating them. I pointed out the pointlessness of that.

you are approaching from a dense mindset that science is a "group" actively out trying to fight religion

Strange, I am seeing so many replies treating Religion as a "group" actively out to fight science. Can we agree that both of these are wrong?

it's because this is a tired trope

Science and religion have nothing in common is a tried trope? Because a lot of the response I'm getting seem the think they have something in common and anything relevant to say about one another.

You don't need religion

Never said you did.

religion says you need it and it actively tries to attack other systems for understanding the world

And here we go treating Religion as a "group" again. I thought that was bad? Or is it only bad if you think someone is doing that to Science?

science broadly wouldn't care one way or another if it disappeared tomorrow or if more people started believing in God

I agree. That's what I've been saying. What are you arguing with specifically?

I cannot fathom why you're being so self-contradictory in your efforts here.

What contradictions? You seem to be under the mistaken impression that I have been arguing for religion at some point. I have done no such thing. I have simply said "arguing science vs religion makes no sense and is a waste of time" and for some reason you assumed that meant I must be arguing for religion when I have done no such thing.(Other than pointing out religion is not a monolithic group I suppose. Pointing out the flaws in a claim is hardly the same arguing for the opposing viewpoints)