this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1618 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

10427 readers
299 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician. See stickied post https://web.archive.org/save is an option. Archive.is is no longer recommended because they remove/alter content.
  7. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 52 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I like using the smart bulbs as part of my wake up alarm. HomeAssistant starts fading the lights on 10 minutes before my alarm is set to go off.

I bought the bulbs before Hue made accounts mandatory, so I blocked the bridge from all internet access, and it never got the update. If I ever need new/more bulbs, I'll be just buying some generic zigbee bulbs.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If it's just dimming you could go with dumb dimmable bulbs and just make the light switch "smart".

Apparently modern dimmers just PWM the power so it wouldn't take much to make something that does that. I assume LED bulbs work nicely with dimmers by now.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The smart light switch has exactly the same problems as the smart bulb, and it's much harder to replace.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

But the benefit of a smart switch is that it remains "always on" for remote control, and physical actions on the switch also reflects on its state at the software level.

That said, I'd go with stuff that don't need online connectivity.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Smart switches aren't really a big deal to swap in. Plus, there's more options for purely local only devices based on espHome.

The only reason I didn't go that route is because I have wall sconces that I wanted to separate from pot lights, and I really don't like doing drywall repairs.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

I'm having a problem with smart switches maybe someone knows the solution, my switches don't have positive and negative, they are 1 wire only, there are some solutions that use a super capacitor I installed one as a test and it works fine.

That said, I'm looking for dimmable and/or ZigBee alternatives that work that way.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

In my case, I don't want all the bulbs on, and splitting up the circuit now would involve cutting holes in my ceiling and walls. Otherwise, yeah, I would have gone with a smart switch. Most LED bulbs are dimmable these days.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

it very much helps to be able to set colour temperature as well as hsl

[–] shadshack@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

Hue bulbs are just zigbee. You can get an offline zigbee hub, plug it into Home Assistant, and control it without needing the Hue hub anymore. Then just keep using your existing bulbs and buy generic zigbee ones as needed to replace when they fail.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 1 points 2 years ago

I bought the bulbs before Hue made accounts mandatory, so I blocked the bridge from all internet access, and it never got the update.

jus a liddle “fhack hueeee” 😎