this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1618 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

10428 readers
674 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major celebrity, figure or any politician
  1. If a tweet (or similar) makes a statement of fact, either mark it as "satire" in the body or provide the original source link backing up the statement (see rule 6)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When was the last time you listened to No. 658?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mine play at random. Actual random, not depending -on-corporate-feels-random.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Picked by random index or ordered in a random sequence? The former has some small chance of playing the same song twice in a row while the latter plays every song before repeating, so the latter is superior.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Actual random afaik, but it keeps track so I can go back to the correct song. With several hundred a "soon repetition" is not really an issue.

[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

My music folder is 8006 files (53.7GB) but I probably only listen to maybe 200 of them that are actually in my normal playlist.