this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1483 readers
135 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Ok, so is there a pick and place machine that can place these accurately at scale?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would have expected them to be grown in place, are these really discrete components? Yeesh.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The article indeed shows/mentions a fabrication method with lithographic techniques. The question then is, can that technique scale to larger monitors or is that limited (by wafer size) to small screens, like those for VR-goggles? Perhaps the super high resolution does not even make sense in larger screen applications like monitors. That would require assembly of several 'chiplets' at great precision.... probably cost prohibitive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Imagine the processor powering that... even 8k at 32million pixels gets extremely intensive on processing power

16k resolution you are looking at over 100mil independent pixels

load more comments (2 replies)