this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
170 points (99.4% liked)
United States | News & Politics
4103 readers
252 users here now
Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
No pics of text
Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
Post news related to the United States.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's specific to Massachusetts police. If these were federal, they wouldn't be beholden to that statute, as it only applies to the commonwealth filing charges of resisting arrest. There is no federal law or statute requiring they identify themselves or agency. That being said, a lawyer likely could prove to a jury an individual was acting reasonably given the information available to them by resisting. That hangs on the hope that you survive the encounter and make it to a court. This is really a rock and a hard place scenario, particularly given the number of masked officers present. Everyone will have to make the call that they can live with or die by in the moment.
And so I just started blasting….