this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
2 points (75.0% liked)
Open Educational Resources
360 readers
1 users here now
A community focused on sharing and talking about free/libre/copyleft/public domain resources for educational use. Resources may include things like textbooks, audiobooks, web apps, apps and more.
Rules:
-
Follow Lemmy site-wide rules and Code of Conduct
-
Prior to posting and if possible, specify the license/nature of the resource(s) and anti-features. The resources should be at least "redistributable" and "remixable" by anyone and everyone.
-
Avoid sharing resources encouraging nationalism, fascism or one-sided views. International solidarity is key.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm sorry, but is your problem really with fractions? In most Geometry-and-up textbooks, the units don't really matter - they'll almost always be decimals, unless where emphasizing fractions or conversions is the point - and you can skip those sections/problems easilly. The ratios in Trig and Polar coordinates can't be helped - a metric degree-minute-(decimal)second angle measurement is literally just that.
Thinking about it, you might have better luck with Chemistry-oriented math textbooks, not because there's no conversions or fractions, but because Avogadro's number really drives home the point of how messy metric still is, outside of the finished textiles industry, and how messy any measurement system always will be. The boon of metric is more that your length, volume and wieght measurements don't change based on context, not that it eliminates all fractions and conversions.
That said, for a more-metric-or-rather-units-agnostic take than most, look around for Byrne's Euclid. Obviously, you can view it on that site, but its also available in pdf, epub(iirc), and print versions. The print version is just about pocketable, and the concepts are damn near the basis of all maths short-of(and encompassing)Calculous.