this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
284 points (97.0% liked)

3DPrinting

17444 readers
119 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been noticing an unsettling trend in the 3D printing world: more and more printer manufacturers are locking down their devices with proprietary firmware, cloud-based software, and other anti-consumer restrictions. Despite this, they still receive glowing reviews, even from tech-savvy communities.

Back in the day, 3D printing was all about open-source hardware, modding, and user control. Now, it feels like we’re heading towards the same path as smartphones and other consumer tech—walled gardens, forced online accounts, and limited third-party compatibility. Some companies even prevent users from using alternative slicers or modifying firmware without jumping through hoops.

My question is: Has 3D printing gone too mainstream? Are newer users simply unaware (or uninterested) in the dangers of locked-down ecosystems? Have we lost the awareness of FOSS (Free and Open-Source Software) and user freedom that once defined this space?

I’d love to hear thoughts from the community. Do you think this is just a phase, or are we stuck on this trajectory? What can we do to push back against enshitification before it’s too late?

(Transparency Note: I wrote this text myself, but since English is not my first language, I used LLM to refine some formulations. The core content and ideas are entirely my own.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (15 children)

Free systems were expensive, hard to use, and had worse finish

Bambu came, made a better [proprietary] product

People obviously bought it

Then other manufacturers saw that they could sell proprietary products just as well and jumped into the bandwagon

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (14 children)

I love DIY.

At home, I run and build DIY printers but you can't deploy them in a business/production. Why? As soon as there is a printer that isn't it just works with easy (and documented) maintance procedures the business needs to hire not only a worker but a worker who knows 3D printers. That's bad.

Printers like the Sovol SV08 and Biqu AMS (still not launched) aren't just there yet.

Combined with the BambuLab pricing on the A1 mini and P1S it is pretty difficult to buy FOSS.

Prusa is close with the Core 1 but they don't have an good AMS package for their printers (their MMU lacks a enclosure/easy to deploy setup). They propably know it but don't have the answer avaible.

Equally on the econmics side it is difficult: The BambuLab P1S killed the (FOSS) market.

If I compare a 1150€ BambuLab X1C against the 1350€ Prusa Core One I would likley prefer the Prusa product/ecosystem. With the P1S it suddently is 700€ compared to 1350€ for a machine that will produce the exact same parts with a near identical cycletime, uptime and opperating/maintance cost. The decission in favor of BambuLab is easy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Open source is a major boon for process automation in a print farm. I also wouldn't trust ANY cloud platform with anything remotely sensitive, like product development prototypes.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)