this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
151 points (99.3% liked)

Historical Artifacts

1041 readers
131 users here now

Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.

Generally speaking, ruins should go to [email protected]

Illustrations of the past should go to [email protected]

Photos of the past should go to [email protected]

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I would totally buy a modern reproduction of this. So cool.

I found a sundial ring somewhere a few years ago, I think it was one of these ...Pewter sundial ring

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Im guessing you adjust the ring to the current month, and that'll show you a time of day.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup that's pretty much it, I wish it came with the original instructions, but I found this online:

https://www.timelesstailors.com/p-15441-pewter-astrology-sundial-ring-pendant.aspx

How it works... Crafted of pewter and brass and available in several design motifs, these bold sundial replicas use a unique "Bead of Light" to tell time. First, adjust the brass band for the correct month. Then suspend the dial by its black satin cord with the hole facing the sun. A ray of sunshine will shine and a bead of light will illuminate a number on the inside of the dial, showing the time of day Nicely packaged, all sundials come with instructions. Calibrated to work best near latitude 40 degrees north.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Neat! That's really cool. Now i want one

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)