this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)

New Jersey Cannabis

212 readers
11 users here now

A source for cannabis news and vaporizer use

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] gingerbier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All completely fair critiques. Grinders are an obsession of mine, probably 15 that I have currently and dozens over the years. Just to clarify price pre-tax or S&H, currently a small aluminum with three grind plates is US$112 (20% off on the GFL site, one plate aluminum is $70 and change, SS small with one plate is $120) on sale compared to $89.95 for a large Santa Cruz (on POTV and their own site). I don't get money from any of them, just to be clear.

You're not the first person I've heard say that their BCG got gunked up, but I haven't heard many in the last five years. The SCS is a solid grinder, produces a grind quality that is comparable, and is also comparable to the BCG as far as resistance to clogging. The BCG's threadless design is the major point of differentiation and eliminates the only complaint I personally had with the SCS; threads gumming up. Having owned both for 5+ years, I think they are the two best herb grinders that you can buy.

Also, never get a four-piece BCG. That thing was trash. I know people lover the Old Mate Designs grinder, but the ball bearing is gimmicky and it flings ground bud when spun. Any of the grinders mentioned will provide adequate home defense when paired with a sock.

[โ€“] noride@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I should clarify I don't have any first hand familiarity with the smaller version, all of my critiques were levied against the large BCG, hence the silly price I paid. Not sure if there is a difference in performance between the two versions one way or the other, just wanted to be transparent about the source of my petulant whining. :)