this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
9 points (80.0% liked)

Futurology

4098 readers
70 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
voidx@futurology.today
Lugh@futurology.today
Espiritdescali@futurology.today
AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today
9
AI Scientist Passes Peer Review for First Time (sakana.ai)
submitted 11 months ago by BaylorSwift3@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No it didn't. It was not a conventional peer review process, it was an aesthetic review of if it looked adequate, not if the content was, and only barely passed… at an ai conference workshop… by people who knew it was an ai produced paper. this is shameful work.