this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
205 points (100.0% liked)

World News

35265 readers
521 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's demonstrably false. Take China as an example where there is a stable political system, a single party in charge, and decisions are made across decades.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We can agree that China is a more stable partner than the US. My point is that party leadership can also change there, leading to policy changes - it just doesn't happen as often and there's usually no dramatic swings when it does. It's a scale, not a binary thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

That's the whole point though, it's the erratic swings in policy that make the US impossible to work with. China doesn't change policy on whim, and it acts rationally. This makes it possible to make long term plans with China and have confidence that China will commit to these plans. The same cannot be said about the US where policy is volatile and unpredictable.