this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1489 readers
193 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's like 600 watts and 50+ amps, its going to get more than hot

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

50 amps if evenly distributed shouldn't be that much of a problem. The distribution is the problem though. And the lack of headroom just makes it all the more worse. 12v 2x6 should have been limited to 500 watts or even 450 watts, and even then that's pushing it as we found out with the 4090 and bad connections.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The fact that we're discussing literal space heater output levels for a fucking graphics card is insane enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Really leans into the fact that efficiency means absolutely nothing to GPU manufacturers compared to a 5% gain just by stuff some more watts into it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The 9070 non-XT seems to be relatively efficient per frame!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)