this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
11 points (92.3% liked)

Sysadmin

13174 readers
97 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
11
Time to reassess the vSAN (blocksandfiles.com)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/sysadmin@lemmy.world
 

As IT leaders move away from VMware, they face a critical decision: do they stick with traditional storage architectures, or is now the time to finally unlock the full potential of an infrastructure that converges virtualization, storage, and networking technologies?

Early convergence efforts centered on hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI), where storage ran as a virtual machine under the hypervisor, commonly called a vSAN. While adoption has lagged behind traditional three-tier architectures, recent advancements have significantly improved vSAN, making it worth reconsidering by addressing past shortcomings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

The above is an ad, but it both open about it and technically interesting, if a bit repetitive.

I honestly had no idea a vSAN was primarily running on hidden storage VMs on the host. I thought the storage stack was as tightly integrated as networking/compute at the hypervisor level, so the light breakdown there was worth the read.