this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
86 points (90.6% liked)
Privacy
2019 readers
136 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Top comment on the lemmy world this was cross posted with points out among other things that the app isn't a system app and doesn't otherwise have permissions to access most of what is claimed here, and from a cursory glance at the app on my phone that claim looks correct. is there something I'm missing or is this post just wrong?
Comment in question: https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/16670102
You're not missing anything. This is FUD.
Can you explain what you mean to a less technologically inclined person?
As discussed in other threads it's a non system APK which holds no dangerous permissions and can't gain them. It will (once enabled and if you let it) scan inbound and outbound messages for nudity. It's there to prevent people from receiving unsolicited nudes without consent, or if they're sending nudes make sure they aren't falling into some pedo groomer blackmail.
I understand the initial response, but now that the info is available I question the motives of people still spreading it.
Well, then I trust my own ability to not fall prey to such blackmail and would rather omit the scanning for battery life's sake. So yes, I'm nitpicky (if that's the conclusion).
It's not open source so it's up to trusting Google for that to be true.